Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society is a landmark United States Supreme Court case decided on June 18, 1982. The case, officially cited as Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, 457 U.S. 332 (1982), addressed the legality of a fixed-fee schedule for medical services set by the Maricopa County Medical Society in Arizona. This decision is significant in the realm of antitrust law and healthcare regulation, as it tackled the issue of price-fixing among competing physicians within a healthcare foundation.
Background[edit | edit source]
The Maricopa County Medical Society had established a maximum fee schedule under a plan known as the Foundation for Medical Care. Physicians who participated in the plan agreed not to charge more than the set fees for their services. The State of Arizona, arguing that this practice constituted illegal price-fixing, brought a lawsuit against the Medical Society under the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Supreme Court Decision[edit | edit source]
The Supreme Court, in a 4-3 decision, ruled that the fixed-fee schedule created by the Maricopa County Medical Society was in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, writing for the majority, held that the practice of setting maximum fees restricted competition among physicians and was therefore illegal. The Court rejected the argument that the fee schedule was justifiable as a means of controlling healthcare costs, emphasizing that antitrust laws do not permit such agreements among competitors.
Implications[edit | edit source]
The ruling in Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society has had profound implications for the healthcare industry and antitrust law. It underscored the principle that healthcare providers, like entities in other sectors, are subject to antitrust regulations. This case has been cited in subsequent legal challenges involving price-fixing and anticompetitive practices in the healthcare sector.
See Also[edit | edit source]
- Sherman Antitrust Act
- Healthcare in the United States
- Antitrust law
- United States Supreme Court cases
References[edit | edit source]
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
|
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
| Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
Medical Disclaimer: WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. The information on WikiMD is provided as an information resource only, may be incorrect, outdated or misleading, and is not to be used or relied on for any diagnostic or treatment purposes. Please consult your health care provider before making any healthcare decisions or for guidance about a specific medical condition. WikiMD expressly disclaims responsibility, and shall have no liability, for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on the information contained in this site. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may from time to time be changed or supplemented by WikiMD. If you do not agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, you should not enter or use this site. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD
