Briggs v. Elliott
[[File:Script error: No such module "InfoboxImage".|frameless|alt=]]
Court | United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina |
---|---|
Full case name | |
Argued | |
Reargued | |
Submitted | |
Indictment | |
Started | |
Decided | 1952 |
Verdict | |
Defendant |
Briggs v. Elliott was a significant court case in the United States that challenged racial segregation in public schools. It was one of the five cases combined into the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1954, which declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional.
Background[edit | edit source]
The case originated in Clarendon County, South Carolina, where African American parents, led by Harry Briggs, Sr., filed a lawsuit against the local school board, represented by R.W. Elliott. The plaintiffs were represented by attorney Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund.
The plaintiffs argued that the segregated school system in Clarendon County was inherently unequal, as African American children were forced to attend schools with inferior facilities, resources, and transportation compared to their white counterparts. This was a direct challenge to the "separate but equal" doctrine established by the Plessy v. Ferguson decision in 1896.
The Case[edit | edit source]
The case was heard in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of South Carolina. The three-judge panel included Judge J. Waties Waring, who was known for his progressive views on civil rights.
In 1951, the court ruled against the plaintiffs, upholding the constitutionality of school segregation. However, Judge Waring issued a dissenting opinion, arguing that segregation was inherently unequal and violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Appeal and Supreme Court Decision[edit | edit source]
The decision in Briggs v. Elliott was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, where it was consolidated with four other cases under the title Brown v. Board of Education. In 1954, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional, overturning the "separate but equal" doctrine.
Impact[edit | edit source]
The Briggs v. Elliott case was instrumental in the fight against segregation and played a crucial role in the civil rights movement. It highlighted the disparities in educational opportunities for African American children and set the stage for further legal challenges to racial discrimination.
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- Kluger, Richard. Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. Board of Education and Black America's Struggle for Equality. New York: Vintage Books, 2004.
- Tushnet, Mark. The NAACP's Legal Strategy Against Segregated Education, 1925-1950. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1987.
External links[edit | edit source]
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
Medical Disclaimer: WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. The information on WikiMD is provided as an information resource only, may be incorrect, outdated or misleading, and is not to be used or relied on for any diagnostic or treatment purposes. Please consult your health care provider before making any healthcare decisions or for guidance about a specific medical condition. WikiMD expressly disclaims responsibility, and shall have no liability, for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on the information contained in this site. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may from time to time be changed or supplemented by WikiMD. If you do not agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, you should not enter or use this site. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD