Chiropractic controversy and criticism
Chiropractic Controversy and Criticism[edit | edit source]
The chiropractic profession, since its inception, has been a subject of debate and contention, both from within its ranks and from external sources. With origins rooted in the principles set forth by its founder, Daniel D. Palmer, chiropractic has faced challenges regarding its scientific basis, its methodologies, and its place within the broader medical community.
Historical Background[edit | edit source]
Chiropractic care was established in the late 19th century by Daniel D. Palmer, who proposed that vertebral subluxations, or misalignments of the spine, were the root cause of all diseases. He believed that by correcting these subluxations through spinal manipulations, one could cure any ailment afflicting the human race.
Palmer's Philosophy[edit | edit source]
At the core of Palmer's teachings was the notion of "Innate Intelligence," an inherent guiding force within the body that maintains health and harmony. According to Palmer, disruptions to this force due to vertebral subluxations led to diseases.
Contemporary Views within the Chiropractic Community[edit | edit source]
In a 2003 survey across the chiropractic profession, it was revealed that the majority of chiropractors, regardless of whether they identified as 'straights' (those adhering strictly to Palmer's teachings) or 'mixers' (those integrating other therapeutic practices), still believed in the principles of Innate Intelligence and the overarching philosophy that spinal manipulation could address a wide spectrum of diseases, not just musculoskeletal complaints like back pain.
Criticisms and Concerns[edit | edit source]
Scientific Scrutiny[edit | edit source]
Critics argue that the foundational principles of chiropractic care, especially the concept of "Innate Intelligence," are rooted more in mysticism than in empirical science. This skepticism has resulted in significant challenges in integrating chiropractic care fully into mainstream medicine.
Legal Implications[edit | edit source]
In the early days of chiropractic practice, many chiropractors, including D.D. Palmer himself, faced legal repercussions, with some even serving jail time for practicing medicine without a license.
Internal Divisions[edit | edit source]
The diverging views between 'straights' and 'mixers' have led to internal conflicts within the chiropractic community, with debates on the scope of practice, methodologies, and the future direction of the profession.
Conclusion[edit | edit source]
While chiropractic care has evolved and diversified since its inception, debates surrounding its foundational principles persist. As with many medical practices, it's essential for individuals to seek information and make informed decisions about their health care choices.
See Also[edit | edit source]
Chiropractic controversy and criticism Resources | ||
---|---|---|
|
|
Navigation: Wellness - Encyclopedia - Health topics - Disease Index - Drugs - World Directory - Gray's Anatomy - Keto diet - Recipes
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
Contributors: Kondreddy Naveen