Dalkon Shield

From WikiMD's Food, Medicine & Wellness Encyclopedia

Dalkon Shield[edit | edit source]

The Dalkon Shield intrauterine device

The Dalkon Shield was a controversial intrauterine device (IUD) that was marketed to women as a highly effective and convenient form of birth control. Manufactured by the A.H. Robins Company, the Dalkon Shield was introduced in the United States in 1971 and quickly gained popularity due to its low cost and ease of use. However, it soon became evident that the device posed serious health risks to women, leading to one of the largest medical product liability cases in history.

History[edit | edit source]

The Dalkon Shield was developed by Dr. Hugh J. Davis, a gynecologist, and was named after his wife, Dalkon. It was designed to be inserted into the uterus, where it would prevent pregnancy by creating a physical barrier and releasing a small amount of copper. The device was marketed as a safe and effective contraceptive option, with claims of a low failure rate and minimal side effects.

Controversy and Health Risks[edit | edit source]

Soon after its introduction, reports of serious health complications associated with the Dalkon Shield began to emerge. Women who used the device experienced a wide range of problems, including pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), septic abortion, infertility, and even death. The design of the Dalkon Shield, with its multifilament string, allowed bacteria to enter the uterus, leading to infections and other complications.

The true extent of the health risks associated with the Dalkon Shield became apparent in the early 1970s when a growing number of women filed lawsuits against the A.H. Robins Company. It was revealed that the company had not conducted adequate testing or research on the device before its release, and had even ignored warnings from medical professionals about its potential dangers.

Legal and Financial Consequences[edit | edit source]

The legal battle surrounding the Dalkon Shield was one of the largest and most complex product liability cases in history. Thousands of women filed lawsuits against the A.H. Robins Company, seeking compensation for their injuries and medical expenses. In 1985, the company filed for bankruptcy due to the overwhelming financial burden of the litigation.

As a result of the lawsuits, the Dalkon Shield was eventually taken off the market in 1974. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also implemented stricter regulations for the approval and monitoring of medical devices, in order to prevent similar incidents in the future.

Legacy and Lessons Learned[edit | edit source]

The Dalkon Shield tragedy served as a wake-up call for the medical community and regulatory agencies. It highlighted the importance of rigorous testing and research before the release of medical devices, as well as the need for effective monitoring and reporting of adverse events. The case also led to significant changes in product liability law, making it easier for consumers to seek compensation for injuries caused by defective products.

Today, the Dalkon Shield remains a cautionary tale in the history of women's health. It serves as a reminder of the potential dangers of rushing a product to market without proper testing and oversight, and the importance of prioritizing patient safety above all else.

See Also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

Wiki.png

Navigation: Wellness - Encyclopedia - Health topics - Disease Index‏‎ - Drugs - World Directory - Gray's Anatomy - Keto diet - Recipes

Search WikiMD


Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro) available.
Advertise on WikiMD

WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.

Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.

Contributors: Admin, Prab R. Tumpati, MD