Gerrymandering

DifferingApportionment

The Gerry-Mander Edit

Elkanah Tisdale, The Gerry-Mander Map, 1813 Cornell CUL PJM 1034 01

Error creating thumbnail:

Gerrymandering 9-6

map22007

Polygons of Georgia Districts 8 and 10

Gerrymandering is a practice intended to establish a political advantage for a particular party or group by manipulating district boundaries. The term is named after Elbridge Gerry, who, as Governor of Massachusetts in 1812, signed a bill that created a contorted-shaped district in the Boston area that was said to resemble the shape of a mythical salamander. The term was first used in the Boston Gazette in 1812.

Origins and History

The origins of gerrymandering date back to the early 19th century, although similar practices have been used throughout history. The practice was named after Elbridge Gerry due to the salamander-shaped district created under his governorship, but he was not the first to manipulate electoral boundaries for political gain. The practice has been used by various countries and political groups to solidify power and influence electoral outcomes.

Methods

Gerrymandering can be achieved through two main tactics: "packing" and "cracking". Packing involves concentrating the opposing party's voting power in one district to reduce their influence in other districts. Cracking involves diluting the voting power of the opposition across many districts to prevent them from winning a significant number of seats. Both tactics are designed to waste votes for the opposition and improve the electoral performance of the party in power.

Effects

The effects of gerrymandering are significant, leading to distorted representation in legislative bodies. It can enable a party to win more seats than is proportional to their share of the vote and can discourage voter turnout by making elections less competitive. Gerrymandering is often criticized for undermining democratic principles by allowing elected officials to choose their voters rather than voters choosing their elected officials.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

Gerrymandering raises several legal and ethical issues. In the United States, the Supreme Court has ruled on several cases related to gerrymandering, with mixed outcomes. While racial gerrymandering has been deemed unconstitutional, the Court has been more hesitant to rule on partisan gerrymandering, leaving the door open for continued manipulation of electoral districts. The ethical considerations of gerrymandering are also significant, as it challenges the fairness and integrity of the electoral process.

Solutions and Reforms

Various solutions and reforms have been proposed to address gerrymandering. These include the establishment of independent or bipartisan redistricting commissions, the use of computer algorithms to draw impartial district boundaries, and the implementation of proportional representation systems. Such reforms aim to create fairer and more equitable electoral systems by removing the incentive and ability to gerrymander.