Graduated electronic decelerator

Graduated Electronic Decelerator

The Graduated Electronic Decelerator (GED) is a device used in certain behavioral modification programs to administer aversive stimuli. It is primarily associated with the treatment of individuals with severe behavioral disorders, particularly in settings where other interventions have proven ineffective. The device delivers a mild electric shock to the skin, intended to deter undesirable behaviors.

A demonstration of the GED device in use on a four-point board

Development and Design

The GED was developed as a tool for behavior modification, particularly in individuals with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities who exhibit self-injurious or aggressive behaviors. The device is designed to deliver a controlled electric shock, which is intended to be aversive enough to interrupt and deter the behavior without causing harm.

The design of the GED includes electrodes that are attached to the skin, typically on the arms or legs. The device can be activated remotely by a caregiver or therapist when the target behavior is observed. The intensity and duration of the shock can be adjusted based on the individual's response and the severity of the behavior.

Controversy and Ethical Considerations

The use of the GED has been highly controversial. Critics argue that the use of electric shocks as a form of behavior modification is inhumane and violates the rights of individuals with disabilities. Proponents, however, claim that for some individuals, the GED is a necessary tool to prevent self-harm and aggression when other interventions have failed.

Ethical concerns have led to significant debate within the medical and psychological communities. Some argue that the potential benefits of reducing harmful behaviors must be weighed against the ethical implications of using aversive stimuli. Others advocate for the development and use of alternative, non-aversive interventions.

Legal and Regulatory Status

The use of the GED is subject to legal and regulatory scrutiny. In some jurisdictions, the use of aversive devices like the GED is restricted or banned. Regulatory bodies have examined the safety and efficacy of the device, leading to varying levels of acceptance and prohibition across different regions.

In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been involved in evaluating the GED, and its use has been the subject of legal challenges and advocacy efforts by disability rights organizations.

Alternatives to the GED

There is ongoing research into alternative methods for managing severe behavioral disorders. These include positive behavioral interventions, applied behavior analysis, and pharmacological treatments. The goal of these alternatives is to provide effective behavior management without the use of aversive stimuli.

Patent drawing of the GED device

Related Pages

• Behavior modification
• Autism spectrum disorder
• Applied behavior analysis
• Ethics in psychology