Jangle

1967 Rickenbacker 360-12 12 string electric guitar owned and photographed by Greg Field

McGuinn 1972 cropped (2)

Jangle, in the context of psychology and psychometrics, refers to the issue of using different terms to describe the same concept or phenomenon, leading to confusion and difficulty in understanding and comparing research findings. This article will delve into the concept of jangle, its implications in psychological research, and how it contrasts with the related concept of jingle fallacy.

Definition

Jangle is a term used to describe the scenario where different labels are used to refer to the same psychological construct, leading to potential confusion and misinterpretation of research findings. This issue arises when researchers or theorists use distinct terminology for constructs that are essentially identical or very similar, making it challenging to compare studies or synthesize literature effectively.

Implications in Psychological Research

The presence of jangle in psychological research can have several implications:

• Difficulty in Literature Synthesis: Jangle can make it challenging for researchers to synthesize findings from different studies, as it may not be immediately apparent that different terms are being used to describe the same concept.
• Increased Risk of Redundancy: Without realizing that research has already been conducted under a different term, researchers may inadvertently replicate studies, leading to unnecessary redundancy in the literature.
• Obstacles in Theory Development: Jangle can hinder the development and refinement of psychological theories if researchers are not aware that they are discussing the same constructs but using different terminology.

Contrast with Jingle Fallacy

Jangle is often discussed in conjunction with the jingle fallacy, which is the opposite issue. The jingle fallacy occurs when the same term is used to describe different constructs, leading to the assumption that these constructs are more similar than they actually are. While jangle involves different terms for the same concept, jingle involves one term for different concepts. Both jangle and jingle fallacies can significantly impact the clarity and progress of psychological research.

Addressing Jangle in Research

To mitigate the effects of jangle in psychological research, several strategies can be employed:

• Standardization of Terminology: Efforts to standardize the terminology used in psychological research can help reduce the occurrence of jangle. This may involve the development of consensus definitions and the use of established constructs.
• Comprehensive Literature Reviews: Conducting thorough literature reviews and including a wide range of terminology can help identify instances of jangle and ensure that all relevant research is considered.
• Clear Definition of Constructs: Researchers should clearly define their constructs and discuss how their definitions relate to those used in other studies. This practice can aid in identifying potential overlaps in terminology.

Conclusion

Jangle presents a significant challenge in psychological research, complicating the synthesis of literature and the development of coherent theories. By recognizing and addressing this issue, researchers can enhance the clarity and comparability of studies, contributing to the advancement of psychological science.

‎