Land grabbing

Bengough cartoon about land speculation in the Northwest Territories

Land grabbing refers to the contentious issue of large-scale land acquisitions, where land traditionally used for agriculture, grazing, or as common areas by local communities is bought or leased on a large scale by domestic or transnational companies, governments, and individuals. Often associated with the displacement of local populations, the degradation of ecosystems, and changes in land use that prioritize export-oriented agriculture over local food production, land grabbing has become a significant concern in global land governance.

Overview

Land grabbing is a phenomenon that has gained prominence in the 21st century, particularly following the 2007-2008 global food price crisis. This crisis led to a surge in investments in agricultural land by foreign investors and governments seeking to secure food supplies for their populations or to invest in biofuels as an alternative energy source. While land acquisitions can bring development opportunities, such as infrastructure development and job creation, they often result in negative outcomes for local communities, including loss of livelihoods, social displacement, and environmental degradation.

Causes

Several factors contribute to land grabbing. The increasing global demand for food, feed, and fuel, driven by population growth, changing diets, and the search for alternative energy sources, has made agricultural land a valuable asset. Additionally, the financialization of land, where land is treated as a commodity for investment rather than a resource for food production, has attracted a range of investors, including hedge funds and pension funds. Weak land governance systems in many countries allow for land deals that lack transparency and do not adequately protect the rights of local communities.

Impacts

The impacts of land grabbing are multifaceted. Economically, while some argue that foreign investment in agriculture can bring capital, technology, and infrastructure, critics point out that the benefits often fail to reach local communities. Socially, land grabbing can lead to displacement and loss of livelihoods for local populations, exacerbating poverty and food insecurity. Environmentally, large-scale agricultural projects can lead to the loss of biodiversity, soil degradation, and increased greenhouse gas emissions.

Responses

Responses to land grabbing have included international guidelines, such as the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries, and Forests in the Context of National Food Security, endorsed by the Committee on World Food Security in 2012. These guidelines aim to improve land governance and protect the rights of local communities. At the national level, some countries have implemented reforms to land laws and policies to increase transparency and ensure that land deals benefit local populations. Civil society organizations and social movements have also played a crucial role in raising awareness and advocating for the rights of communities affected by land grabbing.

Conclusion

Land grabbing remains a contentious issue, reflecting broader challenges in global land governance. While it presents opportunities for investment in agriculture, the negative consequences for local communities and the environment highlight the need for stronger governance mechanisms to ensure that land investments are responsible and sustainable.

• Need help finding a doctor or specialist anywhere in the world? WikiMD's DocFinder can help with millions of doctors!

This article is a stub. Help WikiMD grow by registering to expand it. Editing is available only to registered and verified users. About WikiMD: A comprehensive, free health & wellness encyclopedia.