Leary v. United States
| Leary v. United States | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
| Court | United States Supreme Court | ||||||||
| Decided | May 19, 1969 | ||||||||
| Citation(s) | 395 U.S. 6; 89 S. Ct. 1532; 23 L. Ed. 2d 57; 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2447 | ||||||||
| Case history | |||||||||
| Prior action(s) | Conviction for violation of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 | ||||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||||
| The Marihuana Tax Act was deemed unconstitutional as it required self-incrimination, which violated the Fifth Amendment. | |||||||||
| Court membership | |||||||||
| Judge(s) sitting | Warren E. Burger, William O. Douglas, John Marshall Harlan II, William J. Brennan, Jr., Potter Stewart, Byron White, Abe Fortas, Thurgood Marshall, Hugo Black | ||||||||
| Keywords | |||||||||
| Marihuana Tax Act, Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, self-incrimination | |||||||||
Leary v. United States (395 U.S. 6) is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held that the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937 was unconstitutional because it violated the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination. This case is significant in the context of United States constitutional law and its implications on drug policy and the rights of individuals under the Fifth Amendment.
Background[edit | edit source]
Timothy Leary, a well-known psychologist and advocate for the use of psychedelic substances, was arrested for the possession of marijuana in violation of the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Leary challenged the act, arguing that it required self-incrimination, which conflicted with the Fifth Amendment.
Case[edit | edit source]
The case reached the Supreme Court after Leary was convicted by a lower court. His appeal was based on the argument that the Marihuana Tax Act effectively forced him to reveal his possession of marijuana in order to comply with the law, thereby incriminating himself.
Opinion of the Court[edit | edit source]
The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, agreed with Leary. The Court's opinion, delivered by Justice John Marshall Harlan II, stated that the act's requirements would indeed force individuals to incriminate themselves, as one could not comply with the act without admitting to possession of drugs, which itself was a criminal offense under other federal laws.
Impact[edit | edit source]
The ruling in Leary v. United States led to the repeal of the Marihuana Tax Act and influenced legislation related to drug policy and the rights of the accused. It also had a significant impact on the legal interpretations of the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination.
See also[edit | edit source]
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
|
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
| Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD
