Moral panic

Zeitung Derenburg 1555 crop

CC-BY icon

Moral panic is a term used in sociology and media studies to describe a situation in which public fears and state interventions exceed the objective threat posed by an individual or group who are claimed to be responsible for creating the panic. The concept of moral panic was popularized in the early 1970s by British sociologist Stanley Cohen in his study Folk Devils and Moral Panics, which analyzed the public reaction to the youth subcultures of the Mods and Rockers in the United Kingdom during the 1960s. Cohen described moral panic as a condition, episode, person or group of persons that become defined as a threat to societal values and interests.

Characteristics

Moral panics are characterized by their disproportionality, the volatility of public reaction, and the way in which they are reported and discussed in the mass media. They often involve a heightened level of emotion and irrationality, leading to demands for greater control or action from authorities, which can result in changes to laws and social policy. Key elements include a simplified narrative that pits a morally upright majority against a perceived deviant minority, the use of stereotypes, and the portrayal of the issue in a binary good-versus-evil framework.

Stages of Moral Panic

Moral panics typically follow a pattern or cycle that includes several stages:

1. Identification - A person, event, or group is depicted in a simplistic and exaggerated manner as a threat to societal norms. 2. Concern - Public concern grows, often fueled by sensationalist media coverage. 3. Consensus - A significant portion of the population agrees that the threat is real and serious. 4. Response - Authorities or policymakers respond, sometimes hastily, with laws, regulations, or other actions. 5. Volatility - Moral panics are highly volatile and tend to dissipate as public interest wanes or a new issue arises.

Criticism and Analysis

Critics of the moral panic concept argue that it can oversimplify complex social issues, ignoring the underlying causes of the behavior or condition that is being demonized. It can also lead to scapegoating and the marginalization of vulnerable groups. Furthermore, the role of the media in shaping or amplifying moral panics has been a subject of extensive debate, with some scholars suggesting that media outlets have a vested interest in creating sensational stories to attract viewers or readers.

Examples

Historical examples of moral panics include the Red Scare in the United States during the early 20th century, the Satanic Panic of the 1980s, and more recent concerns over video game violence, internet addiction, and the influence of social media on teenagers. Each of these examples demonstrates how moral panics can lead to significant social, legal, and cultural changes, often based on exaggerated or unfounded fears.

Conclusion

Moral panic is a complex phenomenon that reflects deeper societal anxieties and conflicts. Understanding the dynamics of moral panics can help societies to respond to perceived threats in more measured and constructive ways, avoiding the pitfalls of scapegoating and overreaction.