Sociology of scientific knowledge

From WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia

Cmglee_Cambridge_Science_Festival_2014_balloons

== Sociology of Scientific Knowledge ==

The Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (SSK) is a field within the sociology of science that studies the social processes involved in the production of scientific knowledge. It examines how social factors such as cultural norms, power dynamics, and historical context influence scientific research and the acceptance of scientific theories.

Historical Development[edit | edit source]

The field of SSK emerged in the 1970s as a response to the Mertonian norms of science, which emphasized the objectivity and autonomy of scientific knowledge. Key figures in the development of SSK include David Bloor, Barry Barnes, and Harry Collins. These scholars argued that scientific knowledge is not purely objective but is shaped by social factors.

Key Concepts[edit | edit source]

  • Strong Programme: A central concept in SSK, the Strong Programme, was developed by David Bloor. It posits that both true and false scientific beliefs should be explained in the same way, through social factors.
  • Actor-Network Theory: Developed by Bruno Latour and Michel Callon, this theory examines the networks of relationships between human and non-human actors in the production of scientific knowledge.
  • Social Construction of Technology: This concept explores how social, political, and economic factors influence technological development and scientific research.

Methodologies[edit | edit source]

SSK employs various methodologies to study the social aspects of scientific knowledge, including:

  • Ethnography: In-depth, qualitative studies of scientific communities and practices.
  • Historical Analysis: Examining historical case studies to understand how scientific knowledge has been shaped by social factors.
  • Discourse Analysis: Analyzing scientific texts and communications to uncover underlying social influences.

Criticisms[edit | edit source]

The field of SSK has faced criticism from various quarters. Some argue that it undermines the objectivity of science by overemphasizing social factors. Others believe that it fails to account for the material and empirical aspects of scientific research.

Related Fields[edit | edit source]

See Also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

External Links[edit | edit source]

WikiMD
Navigation: Wellness - Encyclopedia - Health topics - Disease Index‏‎ - Drugs - World Directory - Gray's Anatomy - Keto diet - Recipes

Search WikiMD

Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD

WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia

Let Food Be Thy Medicine
Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates

Medical Disclaimer: WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. The information on WikiMD is provided as an information resource only, may be incorrect, outdated or misleading, and is not to be used or relied on for any diagnostic or treatment purposes. Please consult your health care provider before making any healthcare decisions or for guidance about a specific medical condition. WikiMD expressly disclaims responsibility, and shall have no liability, for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on the information contained in this site. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may from time to time be changed or supplemented by WikiMD. If you do not agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, you should not enter or use this site. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.

Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD