Tanganyika groundnut scheme
Tanganyika Groundnut Scheme
The Tanganyika Groundnut Scheme was a large-scale project launched in 1946 by the British government in Tanganyika Territory (present-day Tanzania) with the aim of cultivating groundnuts (peanuts) in East Africa. The scheme was one of the most ambitious agricultural projects of the post-World War II era and is often cited as a notable example of a failed development project.
Background[edit | edit source]
After World War II, Britain faced severe food shortages and a need to boost its economy. The government, led by the Labour Party, sought ways to increase the production of edible oils and reduce reliance on imports. The Tanganyika Groundnut Scheme was conceived as a solution to these problems, with the goal of transforming 3.5 million acres of bushland into groundnut plantations.
Implementation[edit | edit source]
The project was managed by the Overseas Food Corporation, a body established by the British government specifically for this purpose. Initial surveys were optimistic, suggesting that the land in Tanganyika was suitable for groundnut cultivation. However, the project encountered numerous challenges from the outset, including inadequate rainfall, poor soil fertility, and the lack of infrastructure such as roads and railways to support large-scale agriculture. The machinery imported for the scheme was often unsuitable for the terrain, leading to frequent breakdowns and delays.
Outcomes[edit | edit source]
By 1951, it was clear that the Tanganyika Groundnut Scheme was not viable. The project had failed to produce the expected yields of groundnuts, and the costs had far exceeded initial estimates. The British government decided to abandon the scheme, having spent millions of pounds with little to show for it. The failure of the project was a significant embarrassment for the Labour government and led to widespread criticism of its planning and execution.
Legacy[edit | edit source]
The Tanganyika Groundnut Scheme is often studied as a cautionary tale of top-down development planning and the risks of undertaking large-scale agricultural projects without thorough understanding of local environmental conditions and challenges. It highlighted the importance of feasibility studies and local knowledge in development projects. Despite its failure, the scheme had some positive outcomes, including the development of infrastructure in the region and increased scientific knowledge about tropical agriculture.
See Also[edit | edit source]
This article is a stub. You can help WikiMD by registering to expand it. |
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD