Toleration

Für Toleranz

Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen in 1789

Error creating thumbnail:

Ernest Renan 1876-84

Toleration is the practice of deliberately allowing or permitting a thing of which one disapproves. One can meaningfully speak of tolerating, for example, a social practice, a personal belief, or a group of people, in the sense of allowing or permitting it to exist or occur despite one's disapproval. Toleration is often considered a virtue, particularly in a political and social context. It is a fundamental principle in liberal democracies, where it is seen as essential for the coexistence of diverse groups within a pluralistic society.

Definition and Scope

Toleration involves three basic elements: objection, acceptance, and rejection of interference. It implies that a person or group disapproves of something; they have the power to suppress it but choose not to do so. This concept is distinct from acceptance or endorsement, as it presupposes some level of disapproval.

The scope of toleration can vary widely. It can apply to personal behaviors, cultural practices, religious beliefs, political ideologies, and more. The limits of toleration are a subject of significant debate, particularly when the tolerated beliefs or practices are seen as harmful or offensive by others in society.

Historical Perspectives

The concept of toleration has evolved significantly over time. In the Middle Ages, religious uniformity was often enforced, and heresy was met with persecution. The Reformation and the subsequent religious wars in Europe led to a rethinking of religious toleration. Philosophers such as John Locke argued for religious toleration on the grounds of individual conscience and the separation of church and state.

In the 18th and 19th centuries, the concept of toleration expanded beyond religion to include political and philosophical ideas. The Enlightenment period, in particular, advocated for freedom of speech and the press, arguing that a diversity of opinions was beneficial to society.

Modern Perspectives

In contemporary discussions, toleration is often linked with multiculturalism, freedom of expression, and human rights. It is seen as a necessary condition for democracy and social peace. However, the limits of toleration are a subject of ongoing debate, especially in cases where tolerated practices conflict with universal human rights or the principles of liberal democracy.

Critics of unlimited toleration argue that it can lead to a "tolerance paradox," where tolerating intolerant beliefs or practices can undermine the very basis of a tolerant society. This debate is particularly relevant in discussions about hate speech, religious extremism, and the rights of minority groups.

Toleration vs. Acceptance

It is important to distinguish between toleration and acceptance. Toleration implies a level of disapproval but a commitment to non-interference, whereas acceptance implies a positive attitude or endorsement. This distinction is crucial in discussions about social and cultural diversity, where not all differences need to be celebrated, but a basic level of toleration is necessary for peaceful coexistence.

Conclusion

Toleration is a complex and multifaceted concept that plays a crucial role in the functioning of diverse and democratic societies. While it is often celebrated as a virtue, the limits and implications of toleration continue to be a subject of significant debate. As societies become more diverse, the challenges of practicing toleration while maintaining social cohesion and protecting fundamental rights become increasingly important.