United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd.
United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. was a landmark legal case in the realm of pharmaceutical law and antitrust law in the United States. The case, decided in 1973, involved the United States government and Glaxo Group Limited, a British pharmaceutical company. The core issue at hand was Glaxo's patent and the exclusive marketing rights for vitamin B12, which the U.S. government argued had been used to unlawfully monopolize the market and restrict competition.
Background[edit | edit source]
Vitamin B12 is an essential nutrient, crucial for the normal functioning of the brain and nervous system, and for the formation of blood. It is involved in the metabolism of every cell of the human body, especially affecting DNA synthesis and regulation, but also fatty acid synthesis and energy production. The case arose when the United States Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Glaxo, alleging that the company had engaged in anti-competitive practices that violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Case Details[edit | edit source]
The government's case centered on Glaxo's practices surrounding the patent and distribution of vitamin B12. It was alleged that Glaxo had abused its patent rights by setting excessively high prices and by implementing restrictive licensing agreements that prevented other companies from entering the market. Furthermore, the case highlighted how Glaxo's control over the vitamin B12 market stifled innovation and research into new and potentially more effective treatments.
Court Decision[edit | edit source]
The court ruled in favor of the United States, finding that Glaxo had indeed engaged in monopolistic practices that contravened the Sherman Antitrust Act. The ruling required Glaxo to license the patent for vitamin B12 to other manufacturers under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms. This decision was seen as a significant victory for competition law and for the broader pharmaceutical industry, as it helped to ensure that essential medicines like vitamin B12 would be more accessible and affordable to the public.
Impact[edit | edit source]
The United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. case had a profound impact on the pharmaceutical industry and on antitrust law enforcement. It underscored the importance of maintaining competitive markets in the healthcare sector and set a precedent for how patent rights could be challenged under antitrust laws. The case also highlighted the role of government in regulating the pharmaceutical industry to prevent monopolistic practices and to protect public health.
See Also[edit | edit source]
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD