Vicinage Clause

Sir William Blackstone from NPG

James Madison

YellowstonefallJUN05

== Vicinage Clause ==

The Vicinage Clause is a provision found in the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. It guarantees that a person accused of a crime has the right to be tried by a jury of their peers from the state and district wherein the crime was committed. This clause is a fundamental aspect of the American judicial system, ensuring fairness and impartiality in criminal trials.

Text of the Vicinage Clause[edit | edit source]

The exact wording of the Vicinage Clause in the Sixth Amendment is as follows: "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law..."

Historical Background[edit | edit source]

The concept of vicinage, or the right to be tried by a jury from the locality where the crime occurred, has its roots in English common law. The framers of the United States Constitution included this provision to protect against potential abuses of power by ensuring that defendants would be judged by members of their own community.

Legal Interpretation[edit | edit source]

The interpretation of the Vicinage Clause has evolved over time through various Supreme Court rulings. One significant case is United States v. Dawson, where the Court held that the clause requires the jury to be drawn from the state and district where the crime was committed.

Related Provisions[edit | edit source]

The Vicinage Clause is closely related to other provisions in the Sixth Amendment, including the right to a speedy trial, the right to a public trial, and the right to an impartial jury. Together, these rights form the cornerstone of the protections afforded to criminal defendants in the United States.

Modern Application[edit | edit source]

In modern times, the Vicinage Clause continues to play a crucial role in ensuring fair trials. It is particularly relevant in cases involving high-profile crimes or extensive media coverage, where finding an impartial jury can be challenging.