Angelita C. et al. v. California Department of Pesticide Regulation
Angelita C. et al. v. California Department of Pesticide Regulation | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||
Court | California Supreme Court | ||||||||
Decided | [Date] | ||||||||
Citation(s) | [Citation] | ||||||||
Case history | |||||||||
Prior action(s) | [Prior actions] | ||||||||
Subsequent action(s) | [Subsequent actions] | ||||||||
Court membership | |||||||||
Judge(s) sitting | [Judge names] |
Angelita C. et al. v. California Department of Pesticide Regulation was a landmark court case heard by the California Supreme Court. The case centered around the use of pesticides in California and its impact on public health and the environment.
Background[edit | edit source]
The plaintiffs, represented by Angelita C. and others, filed a lawsuit against the California Department of Pesticide Regulation alleging that the department's regulations on pesticide use were inadequate and failed to protect the health and safety of the public. The plaintiffs argued that the department's actions violated state laws and regulations governing pesticide use.
Legal Proceedings[edit | edit source]
The case was brought before the California Supreme Court, where the judges heard arguments from both the plaintiffs and the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. The court examined the relevant laws and regulations pertaining to pesticide use in California and considered the potential health and environmental impacts of current practices.
Decision[edit | edit source]
In a landmark ruling, the California Supreme Court sided with the plaintiffs, finding that the California Department of Pesticide Regulation had failed in its duty to adequately regulate pesticide use in the state. The court ordered the department to revise its regulations and enforcement practices to better protect public health and the environment.
Impact[edit | edit source]
The decision in Angelita C. et al. v. California Department of Pesticide Regulation had far-reaching implications for pesticide regulation in California and set a precedent for similar cases in other states. The case highlighted the importance of robust regulatory frameworks to safeguard public health and the environment from the potential harms of pesticide exposure.
See also[edit | edit source]
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD