BDORT

Bi-Digital O-Ring Test (BDORT) is a diagnostic method that claims to assess the health status of individuals through muscle strength testing. The technique was developed by Dr. Yoshiaki Omura in the early 1980s. BDORT is based on the concept that the body's electromagnetic field can be influenced by external factors, and this influence can be measured through changes in muscle strength, particularly the strength of the thumb and fingers forming an O-ring.

Overview

The Bi-Digital O-Ring Test involves the practitioner asking the patient to form an O-ring using the thumb and another finger, usually the index finger. The practitioner then attempts to break this O-ring by applying pressure to the fingers while introducing various substances or stimuli near the patient's body. The premise is that the patient's muscle strength, as measured by the ability to maintain the O-ring, changes in response to these substances or stimuli. Proponents of BDORT believe that this change can indicate the presence of diseases, deficiencies, or imbalances in the body.

Methodology

The methodology of BDORT is based on a series of steps:

1. The patient is asked to form an O-ring with their thumb and finger.
2. The practitioner introduces a specific substance or stimulus to the patient's electromagnetic field.
3. The practitioner applies pressure to try and break the O-ring.
4. The ease or difficulty with which the O-ring is broken is believed to indicate the patient's health status in relation to the substance or stimulus being tested.

Criticism and Controversy

BDORT has been met with significant skepticism and criticism from the medical and scientific communities. Critics argue that there is a lack of empirical evidence supporting the efficacy and reliability of the test. Furthermore, the principles behind BDORT are not widely accepted by mainstream science and medicine, which question the validity of using muscle strength testing as a diagnostic tool. The method is often categorized as pseudoscience.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

There have been legal and ethical concerns regarding the practice of BDORT. In some jurisdictions, the use of unproven diagnostic methods like BDORT by healthcare professionals can lead to legal repercussions, including the revocation of medical licenses.

Conclusion

While the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test has its proponents within certain alternative medicine circles, it remains controversial and is not recognized as a valid diagnostic tool by the broader medical and scientific communities. Individuals seeking medical diagnosis and treatment are advised to consult with licensed healthcare professionals who use evidence-based practices.

‎

---

Translate: - East Asian 中文, 日本, 한국어, South Asian हिन्दी, தமிழ், తెలుగు, Urdu, ಕನ್ನಡ, Southeast Asian Indonesian, Vietnamese, Thai, မြန်မာဘာသာ, বাংলা
European español, Deutsch, français, Greek, português do Brasil, polski, română, русский, Nederlands, norsk, svenska, suomi, Italian
Middle Eastern & African عربى, Turkish, Persian, Hebrew, Afrikaans, isiZulu, Kiswahili,
Other Bulgarian, Hungarian, Czech, Swedish, മലയാളം, मराठी, ਪੰਜਾਬੀ, ગુજરાતી, Portuguese, Ukrainian