Forest plots

Forest plots are a graphical representation used primarily in meta-analysis to show the estimates of the effects from multiple quantitative scientific studies addressing the same question, along with the overall estimate. The plot displays the point estimates of the effect (usually a measure of relative effect, such as a risk ratio, odds ratio, or mean difference) from individual studies on a common scale, against a line that represents no effect. Each point estimate is accompanied by a confidence interval, typically represented by a horizontal line through the point estimate. The size of the square around the point estimate often reflects the weight of the study in the meta-analysis.

Overview

Forest plots are a key tool in evidence-based medicine and healthcare decision-making, providing a concise visual summary of the evidence from multiple studies on the effectiveness of interventions. They are particularly useful for comparing the results of studies that may have different sample sizes or measures of effect but address a similar research question.

Components of a Forest Plot

A typical forest plot consists of several components:

• Study Descriptions: The names of the studies (often the first author's surname and publication year) are listed on the y-axis.
• Point Estimates and Confidence Intervals: Each study's effect estimate is represented by a point, and its confidence interval is represented by a horizontal line through the point. The length of the line reflects the precision of the estimate; longer lines indicate less precision.
• Weight: The size of the point estimate symbol (usually a square) indicates the weight of the study in the meta-analysis, which is often related to the inverse of the variance of the estimate.
• Overall Estimate: A diamond shape typically represents the pooled estimate from the meta-analysis, with the width of the diamond reflecting the confidence interval of the pooled estimate.
• Line of No Effect: A vertical line, often at the value of 1 for odds ratios or 0 for mean differences, indicates the point at which the intervention has no effect.

Interpretation

Interpreting a forest plot involves assessing the point estimates, confidence intervals, and the overall estimate. If the confidence intervals of most studies overlap with the line of no effect, it suggests that there is no significant effect. Conversely, if the confidence intervals for most studies do not overlap with the line of no effect, it suggests a significant effect. The overall estimate provides a summary measure of the effect, taking into account the size and precision of the individual studies.

Uses

Forest plots are widely used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses to summarize the results of studies on a wide range of topics in medicine, public health, psychology, education, and other fields. They help researchers, clinicians, policymakers, and patients to understand the evidence on the effectiveness of interventions and to make informed decisions.

Limitations

While forest plots are a powerful tool for summarizing evidence, they also have limitations. They can be misleading if the studies included in the meta-analysis are of poor quality or if there is significant heterogeneity among the studies. Additionally, forest plots do not provide information on the quality of the studies or the presence of publication bias.

‎

---

Translate: - East Asian 中文, 日本, 한국어, South Asian हिन्दी, தமிழ், తెలుగు, Urdu, ಕನ್ನಡ, Southeast Asian Indonesian, Vietnamese, Thai, မြန်မာဘာသာ, বাংলা
European español, Deutsch, français, Greek, português do Brasil, polski, română, русский, Nederlands, norsk, svenska, suomi, Italian
Middle Eastern & African عربى, Turkish, Persian, Hebrew, Afrikaans, isiZulu, Kiswahili,
Other Bulgarian, Hungarian, Czech, Swedish, മലയാളം, मराठी, ਪੰਜਾਬੀ, ગુજરાતી, Portuguese, Ukrainian