Gomillion v. Lightfoot
Gomillion v. Lightfoot[edit | edit source]
Gomillion v. Lightfoot, 364 U.S. 339 (1960), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that addressed racial gerrymandering and the violation of the Fifteenth Amendment. The case arose from the redrawing of the electoral district boundaries of Tuskegee, Alabama, which effectively disenfranchised African American voters.
Background[edit | edit source]
In the late 1950s, the city of Tuskegee, Alabama, was home to a significant African American population. The city was known for the Tuskegee Institute, a historically black university. In 1957, the Alabama legislature enacted Local Law 140, which redefined the boundaries of Tuskegee from a square shape to a 28-sided figure. This redistricting removed all but a few African American voters from the city limits, while leaving white voters largely unaffected.
The redistricting was challenged by Charles Gomillion and other African American residents of Tuskegee, who argued that the new boundaries were drawn with the intent to disenfranchise black voters, violating their rights under the Fifteenth Amendment, which prohibits denying a citizen the right to vote based on race.
Legal Proceedings[edit | edit source]
The case was initially dismissed by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, which held that the state had the authority to draw electoral boundaries. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal. The plaintiffs then appealed to the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court Decision[edit | edit source]
The Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision delivered by Justice Felix Frankfurter, reversed the lower courts' decisions. The Court held that the redistricting was unconstitutional as it violated the Fifteenth Amendment. Justice Frankfurter stated that "the essential inevitable effect of this redefinition of Tuskegee's boundaries is to deprive the Negro petitioners discriminatorily of the benefits of residence in Tuskegee and consequently of their voting rights in municipal elections."
The Court's decision in Gomillion v. Lightfoot was significant because it established that state actions that result in racial discrimination in voting are subject to judicial scrutiny, even if they do not explicitly mention race. This case set a precedent for future cases involving racial gerrymandering and voting rights.
Impact and Legacy[edit | edit source]
Gomillion v. Lightfoot was a pivotal case in the civil rights movement, reinforcing the federal government's role in protecting voting rights against racial discrimination. It paved the way for subsequent legislation, including the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which aimed to eliminate racial discrimination in voting.
The case also highlighted the use of the Fifteenth Amendment as a tool to challenge racially discriminatory practices in voting, influencing future litigation and civil rights advocacy.
See Also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- "Gomillion v. Lightfoot," 364 U.S. 339 (1960).
- "The Voting Rights Act of 1965," National Archives and Records Administration.
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
Medical Disclaimer: WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. The information on WikiMD is provided as an information resource only, may be incorrect, outdated or misleading, and is not to be used or relied on for any diagnostic or treatment purposes. Please consult your health care provider before making any healthcare decisions or for guidance about a specific medical condition. WikiMD expressly disclaims responsibility, and shall have no liability, for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on the information contained in this site. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may from time to time be changed or supplemented by WikiMD. If you do not agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, you should not enter or use this site. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD