Haryana Raxil Drug Purchase Case

Haryana Raxil Drug Purchase Case

The Haryana Raxil Drug Purchase Case refers to a controversial procurement incident that took place in the Indian state of Haryana. This case involves the procurement of Raxil, a fungicide, purportedly to combat a disease affecting wheat crops. The controversy centers around allegations of irregularities and corruption in the purchase process, including the procurement of the drug at inflated prices and without proper tendering procedures.

Background

Wheat is a staple crop in Haryana, contributing significantly to the state's economy and the country's food security. The crop is susceptible to various diseases, including fungal infections, which can significantly reduce yield. To combat these diseases, the use of fungicides is a common agricultural practice. Raxil, a fungicide produced by Bayer CropScience, is one such chemical used to treat seed-borne diseases in wheat.

The Case

In 2012, allegations surfaced regarding the procurement of Raxil by the Haryana government. It was claimed that the fungicide was purchased without following the mandatory competitive bidding process, leading to questions about the transparency and fairness of the procurement. Furthermore, it was alleged that the drug was bought at prices significantly higher than the market rate, causing a loss to the state exchequer.

Critics argued that the procurement was not only financially imprudent but also lacked scientific basis, as the effectiveness of Raxil in combating the specific disease affecting the wheat crop in Haryana was questioned. The controversy led to public outcry and demands for a thorough investigation into the matter.

Investigations and Outcomes

Following the allegations, the Haryana government initiated an inquiry into the procurement process. The investigation aimed to ascertain whether there were any procedural lapses or corruption involved in the purchase of Raxil. The outcome of the investigation, however, has been a subject of contention, with critics alleging that it lacked depth and failed to hold any significant figures accountable.

Impact

The Haryana Raxil Drug Purchase Case has had several implications. Firstly, it brought to light the challenges and potential pitfalls in the procurement processes used by state governments in India. Secondly, it raised questions about the accountability and transparency of public officials in managing resources and making decisions that affect public welfare. Lastly, it highlighted the need for rigorous scientific evaluation of agricultural interventions to ensure they are both effective and economically viable.

See Also

• Agriculture in India
• Corruption in India
• Public procurement in India

References

• Need help finding a doctor or specialist anywhere in the world? WikiMD's DocFinder can help with millions of doctors!

This article is a stub. Help WikiMD grow by registering to expand it. Editing is available only to registered and verified users. About WikiMD: A comprehensive, free health & wellness encyclopedia.