Meta-analysis

From WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia

(Redirected from Metaanalysis)

A meta-analysis is a statistical technique used to synthesize results from multiple scientific studies on the same topic, allowing for a more precise estimate of the effect size than any individual study alone. This method combines data from separate but similar studies, such as clinical trials, observational studies, or surveys, to identify patterns, sources of disagreement, or other interesting relationships that may come to light in the context of multiple studies.

Medical guide

Overview[edit | edit source]

Meta-analysis is a fundamental component of systematic reviews and is widely used across various disciplines, including medicine, psychology, education, and environmental science. By aggregating data, meta-analyses provide a higher statistical power, offering insights that might not be apparent from the individual studies.

History[edit | edit source]

The term "meta-analysis" was coined in the late 1970s by the statistician Gene V. Glass, who defined it as "the statistical analysis of a large collection of analysis results from individual studies for the purpose of integrating the findings." The practice, however, predates this definition, with early forms of meta-analyses being conducted in the fields of psychology and education research in the mid-20th century.

Methodology[edit | edit source]

The process of conducting a meta-analysis involves several key steps:

  1. Identification of a clear research question.
  2. Systematic search and selection of relevant studies based on predefined criteria.
  3. Extraction and coding of data from the selected studies.
  4. Statistical analysis to combine the data, often using effect sizes and confidence intervals.
  5. Assessment of heterogeneity among the studies' results.
  6. Exploration of potential publication bias.
  7. Interpretation and presentation of the results in the context of the larger body of research on the topic.

Statistical Models[edit | edit source]

Two main statistical models are used in meta-analyses: the fixed-effects model and the random-effects model. The choice between models depends on the assumption about the underlying effect sizes in the included studies:

  • The fixed-effects model assumes that all studies are estimating the same true effect size.
  • The random-effects model allows for variation among the effect sizes of the included studies, accounting for the possibility that the study population and methodologies may differ across studies.

Strengths and Limitations[edit | edit source]

Strengths[edit | edit source]

  • Increases statistical power by combining data from multiple studies.
  • Allows for the estimation of effect sizes with greater precision.
  • Can uncover trends and relationships not evident in individual studies.
  • Facilitates evidence-based decision-making in policy and practice.

Limitations[edit | edit source]

  • Susceptible to publication bias, where studies with significant or positive results are more likely to be published.
  • Variability in study quality and methodology can introduce heterogeneity, complicating the interpretation of results.
  • Results are dependent on the quality and characteristics of the included studies.
  • May be biased by the inclusion criteria and the subjective decisions made during data extraction and analysis.

Applications[edit | edit source]

Meta-analysis is applied in numerous fields to address a wide range of research questions. In medicine, it is often used to aggregate results from clinical trials to determine the effectiveness of treatments or interventions. In psychology and social sciences, meta-analyses help in understanding the consistency of psychological theories across different study settings. Environmental scientists use meta-analysis to assess the impact of environmental exposures on health outcomes.

Controversies and Challenges[edit | edit source]

While meta-analysis is a powerful tool, it is not without controversies. The method's reliability is heavily dependent on the quality of the included studies. Critics also point out the risk of "apples and oranges" comparisons, where heterogeneity among studies is high. Moreover, meta-analyses are sometimes criticized for being used to support preconceived notions, highlighting the importance of transparency and reproducibility in the meta-analytic process.

See Also[edit | edit source]

External Links[edit | edit source]



Meta-analysis Resources
Wikipedia
WikiMD
Navigation: Wellness - Encyclopedia - Health topics - Disease Index‏‎ - Drugs - World Directory - Gray's Anatomy - Keto diet - Recipes

Search WikiMD

Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD

WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia

Let Food Be Thy Medicine
Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates

Medical Disclaimer: WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. The information on WikiMD is provided as an information resource only, may be incorrect, outdated or misleading, and is not to be used or relied on for any diagnostic or treatment purposes. Please consult your health care provider before making any healthcare decisions or for guidance about a specific medical condition. WikiMD expressly disclaims responsibility, and shall have no liability, for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on the information contained in this site. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may from time to time be changed or supplemented by WikiMD. If you do not agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, you should not enter or use this site. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.

Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD