Rogers v. American Airlines (1981)
Rogers v. American Airlines, Inc. (1981) is a landmark legal case in the realm of employment discrimination, civil rights, and personal appearance policies in the workplace. The case was brought before the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, where the plaintiff, Renee Rogers, an employee of American Airlines, challenged the airline's grooming policy as discriminatory. This policy prohibited employees from wearing an all-braided hairstyle, which Rogers argued was an expression of her African-American cultural and ethnic identity.
Background[edit | edit source]
Renee Rogers, a black woman, was employed as a flight attendant by American Airlines. The airline's grooming policy at the time prohibited employees from wearing their hair in braids, which the company categorized under "extreme and unusual" hairstyles. Rogers contended that this policy was discriminatory against black women, as braiding is a traditional hairstyle that holds cultural significance and is a common method for managing the natural texture of African-American hair.
Case[edit | edit source]
Rogers filed a lawsuit against American Airlines, alleging that the company's grooming policy was in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Rogers argued that the policy was racially discriminatory because it disproportionately affected black employees and was not applied equally to employees of all races.
Decision[edit | edit source]
The court ruled in favor of American Airlines, finding that the company's grooming policy did not violate Title VII. The court reasoned that the policy applied equally to all employees, regardless of race, and that it was within the employer's rights to establish grooming standards for its employees. The court also noted that Title VII was not intended to cover disputes over personal appearance policies unless they had a direct and unjustified impact on employees of a particular race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Impact[edit | edit source]
The decision in Rogers v. American Airlines has been a subject of debate and analysis in the fields of employment law, civil rights law, and cultural studies. Critics argue that the ruling overlooks the cultural and racial implications of grooming policies and their potential to discriminate against certain groups of employees. The case has been cited in subsequent legal challenges to workplace appearance policies, particularly those that may disproportionately affect employees from specific racial or ethnic backgrounds.
See Also[edit | edit source]
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD