Sham peer review

Sham peer review is a term used to describe a process that masquerately adopts the guise of a legitimate peer review in the medical field but is actually conducted with the intent of discrediting or disciplining a physician or other healthcare professional for reasons other than the quality of care or adherence to professional standards. This phenomenon raises significant concerns within the medical community, as it undermines the integrity of the peer review process, which is essential for maintaining standards of care, ensuring patient safety, and fostering professional development.

Overview

Peer review in the medical context is a critical mechanism used by healthcare institutions, including hospitals and medical boards, to evaluate the performance of healthcare professionals. The process involves assessing the quality of care provided by physicians and other healthcare professionals, with the aim of identifying areas for improvement, ensuring that patients receive the highest standard of care, and upholding the ethical and professional standards of the medical profession. However, when peer review is used as a tool for personal vendettas, financial gain, or other non-professional reasons, it becomes a sham peer review.

Characteristics of Sham Peer Review

Sham peer review typically exhibits several distinguishing characteristics, including but not limited to:

• Lack of fairness in the review process
• Review conducted with bias or conflict of interest
• Absence of a genuine concern for improving quality of care
• Use of the process as a means to retaliate against or suppress dissenting voices within the medical community
• Decisions made without adequate evidence or through the manipulation of information

Consequences

The consequences of sham peer review can be devastating for the targeted healthcare professional. It can lead to unwarranted disciplinary actions, including suspension, revocation of medical licenses, and loss of hospital privileges. Moreover, it can tarnish a professional's reputation, leading to significant personal and financial hardships. For the healthcare system, sham peer review can erode trust in the peer review process, discourage open discussion and reporting of errors or concerns, and ultimately compromise patient care.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

Sham peer review raises significant legal and ethical issues. Affected healthcare professionals may seek legal recourse to challenge the outcomes of such reviews, although this can be a complex and challenging process. Ethically, sham peer review violates the principles of justice, fairness, and integrity that are foundational to the medical profession and the peer review process.

Preventing Sham Peer Review

Efforts to prevent sham peer review focus on ensuring transparency, fairness, and accountability in the peer review process. This includes establishing clear guidelines and standards for conducting reviews, ensuring that reviewers are free from conflicts of interest, providing the reviewed professional with an opportunity to respond to criticisms, and implementing mechanisms for independent oversight of the review process.

See Also

• Medical ethics
• Professional misconduct
• Healthcare quality

‎ ‎

---

Translate: - East Asian 中文, 日本, 한국어, South Asian हिन्दी, தமிழ், తెలుగు, Urdu, ಕನ್ನಡ, Southeast Asian Indonesian, Vietnamese, Thai, မြန်မာဘာသာ, বাংলা
European español, Deutsch, français, Greek, português do Brasil, polski, română, русский, Nederlands, norsk, svenska, suomi, Italian
Middle Eastern & African عربى, Turkish, Persian, Hebrew, Afrikaans, isiZulu, Kiswahili,
Other Bulgarian, Hungarian, Czech, Swedish, മലയാളം, मराठी, ਪੰਜਾਬੀ, ગુજરાતી, Portuguese, Ukrainian