Bowen V. Georgetown University Hospital
Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital is a landmark case in administrative law that was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1988. The case is significant for its ruling on the retroactivity of administrative rules.
Background[edit | edit source]
In 1984, the Secretary of Health and Human Services attempted to recoup overpayments made to hospitals under the Medicare program. The Secretary did this by applying a new rule retroactively. Georgetown University Hospital and several other hospitals challenged this action, arguing that the Secretary did not have the authority to apply the rule retroactively.
Decision[edit | edit source]
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the hospitals. The Court held that unless Congress has expressly authorized it, an administrative agency does not have the power to apply a new rule retroactively. The Court stated that retroactivity is not favored in the law and should not be applied in the absence of clear legislative intent.
Impact[edit | edit source]
The decision in Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital has had a significant impact on administrative law. It has been cited in numerous cases and has been a key factor in limiting the power of administrative agencies to change their rules retroactively.
See also[edit | edit source]
Navigation: Wellness - Encyclopedia - Health topics - Disease Index - Drugs - World Directory - Gray's Anatomy - Keto diet - Recipes
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD