Frykman classification

Frykman Classification is a system used in the field of orthopedics to categorize distal radius fractures. It was developed by Dr. Gösta Frykman in 1967 and has been widely used in clinical practice and research.

The Frykman Classification is based on the involvement of the radiocarpal joint and the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). It also takes into account whether the ulnar styloid process is fractured. The classification system consists of eight types of fractures, each with its unique characteristics and implications for treatment and prognosis.

Classification

The Frykman Classification includes the following types of fractures:

1. Type I: Fracture of the radius without involvement of the radiocarpal or DRUJ.
2. Type II: Fracture of the radius with involvement of the radiocarpal joint but not the DRUJ.
3. Type III: Fracture of the radius and ulnar styloid process without involvement of the radiocarpal or DRUJ.
4. Type IV: Fracture of the radius and ulnar styloid process with involvement of the radiocarpal joint but not the DRUJ.
5. Type V: Fracture of the radius with involvement of both the radiocarpal and DRUJ.
6. Type VI: Fracture of the radius and ulnar styloid process with involvement of both the radiocarpal and DRUJ.
7. Type VII: Comminuted fracture of the radius with involvement of both the radiocarpal and DRUJ.
8. Type VIII: Comminuted fracture of the radius and ulnar styloid process with involvement of both the radiocarpal and DRUJ.

Clinical Significance

The Frykman Classification is used to guide the treatment of distal radius fractures. The type of fracture can influence the choice of treatment, which may range from conservative management with casting or splinting to surgical intervention. The classification can also provide prognostic information, as certain types of fractures are associated with a higher risk of complications such as malunion, nonunion, and post-traumatic arthritis.

Limitations

While the Frykman Classification is widely used, it has some limitations. It does not take into account the patient's age, overall health, or functional demands, which can significantly influence treatment decisions and outcomes. Furthermore, it does not provide detailed information about the fracture's exact location, displacement, or angulation, which are important factors in surgical planning.

See Also

• Distal radius fracture
• Orthopedic surgery
• Radiocarpal joint
• Distal radioulnar joint

‎