In re Quinlan
In re Quinlan was a landmark legal case in the United States that had a significant impact on the right to die and end-of-life care decisions. The case involved Karen Ann Quinlan, a young woman who became unconscious after consuming a combination of alcohol and drugs. She entered a persistent vegetative state, and her parents sought to remove her from a ventilator that was keeping her alive.
Background[edit | edit source]
Karen Ann Quinlan was born on March 29, 1954, in Scranton, Pennsylvania. On April 15, 1975, at the age of 21, she collapsed after consuming alcohol and tranquilizers at a party. She was subsequently taken to a hospital where she was placed on a mechanical ventilator to assist her breathing. Despite medical efforts, she did not regain consciousness and was diagnosed as being in a persistent vegetative state.
Legal Proceedings[edit | edit source]
In 1975, Karen's parents, Joseph and Julia Quinlan, requested that the hospital remove her from the ventilator, arguing that she would not have wanted to live in such a condition. The hospital refused, citing ethical and legal concerns. The Quinlans then took their case to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
On March 31, 1976, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Quinlans, allowing them to remove Karen from the ventilator. The court's decision was based on the right to privacy, which it interpreted as encompassing the right to refuse medical treatment. This case set a precedent for future right-to-die cases and influenced the development of advance directives and living wills.
Aftermath[edit | edit source]
Following the court's decision, Karen Ann Quinlan was removed from the ventilator. However, she continued to live in a persistent vegetative state for nearly a decade, sustained by artificial nutrition and hydration. She passed away on June 11, 1985.
Impact[edit | edit source]
The In re Quinlan case had a profound impact on bioethics, medical law, and end-of-life care in the United States. It highlighted the importance of patient autonomy and the right to refuse life-sustaining treatment. The case also led to increased awareness and use of advance directives and living wills.
See also[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
External links[edit | edit source]
Search WikiMD
Ad.Tired of being Overweight? Try W8MD's physician weight loss program.
Semaglutide (Ozempic / Wegovy and Tirzepatide (Mounjaro / Zepbound) available.
Advertise on WikiMD
WikiMD's Wellness Encyclopedia |
Let Food Be Thy Medicine Medicine Thy Food - Hippocrates |
Translate this page: - East Asian
中文,
日本,
한국어,
South Asian
हिन्दी,
தமிழ்,
తెలుగు,
Urdu,
ಕನ್ನಡ,
Southeast Asian
Indonesian,
Vietnamese,
Thai,
မြန်မာဘာသာ,
বাংলা
European
español,
Deutsch,
français,
Greek,
português do Brasil,
polski,
română,
русский,
Nederlands,
norsk,
svenska,
suomi,
Italian
Middle Eastern & African
عربى,
Turkish,
Persian,
Hebrew,
Afrikaans,
isiZulu,
Kiswahili,
Other
Bulgarian,
Hungarian,
Czech,
Swedish,
മലയാളം,
मराठी,
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ,
ગુજરાતી,
Portuguese,
Ukrainian
Medical Disclaimer: WikiMD is not a substitute for professional medical advice. The information on WikiMD is provided as an information resource only, may be incorrect, outdated or misleading, and is not to be used or relied on for any diagnostic or treatment purposes. Please consult your health care provider before making any healthcare decisions or for guidance about a specific medical condition. WikiMD expressly disclaims responsibility, and shall have no liability, for any damages, loss, injury, or liability whatsoever suffered as a result of your reliance on the information contained in this site. By visiting this site you agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, which may from time to time be changed or supplemented by WikiMD. If you do not agree to the foregoing terms and conditions, you should not enter or use this site. See full disclaimer.
Credits:Most images are courtesy of Wikimedia commons, and templates Wikipedia, licensed under CC BY SA or similar.
Contributors: Prab R. Tumpati, MD