Great Barrington Declaration

Kulldorff gupta bhattacharya

Mukhisa Kituyi, Houlin Zhao, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus with Sophia - AI for Good Global Summit 2018 (41223188035) (cropped)

Anthony Fauci 2020

David Nabarro April 2016 (26106492653) (cropped)

Professor Devi Sridhar

Great Barrington Declaration

The Great Barrington Declaration is a statement that was authored and signed in October 2020, advocating an alternative approach to managing the COVID-19 pandemic through what it terms "Focused Protection". The declaration was authored by Dr. Martin Kulldorff (a professor of medicine at Harvard University), Dr. Sunetra Gupta (a professor of theoretical epidemiology at the University of Oxford), and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (a professor of medicine at Stanford University). It was signed in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, hence its name.

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic led to unprecedented global public health responses, including lockdowns, social distancing measures, and the rapid development of COVID-19 vaccines. In response to these measures, some public health scientists and medical professionals proposed alternative strategies for managing the pandemic.

Content

The Great Barrington Declaration argues that the adverse effects of lockdowns and restrictive measures disproportionately affect the less privileged members of society and that these measures could lead to significant health issues in the long term, including lower childhood vaccination rates and worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes. Instead, the declaration proposes a strategy of Focused Protection, aiming to minimize mortality and social harm until herd immunity is reached. This involves protecting the most vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and those with significant health conditions, while allowing those at lower risk to return to normal life, thereby building up immunity to the virus through natural infection.

Reception

The reception to the Great Barrington Declaration has been mixed. Supporters argue that it offers a realistic and humane approach to dealing with the pandemic, emphasizing the importance of considering the broader health and economic impacts of lockdowns. Critics, including many public health experts and organizations, have raised concerns about the feasibility and ethics of the approach. They argue that allowing the virus to spread in controlled segments of the population could lead to unnecessary infections, deaths, and long-term health problems, including long COVID. Critics also express skepticism about the speed at which herd immunity could be safely achieved without overwhelming healthcare systems.

Impact

The declaration has sparked significant debate among the public health community, policymakers, and the general public. It has been cited by some government officials and policymakers in discussions about how to balance public health measures with economic and social considerations. However, the predominant global response to the pandemic has continued to focus on measures such as social distancing, mask-wearing, and vaccination, rather than the approach advocated by the Great Barrington Declaration.

See Also

• COVID-19 pandemic
• Herd immunity
• Public health
• Social distancing
• COVID-19 vaccines

‎ ‎

---

Translate: - East Asian 中文, 日本, 한국어, South Asian हिन्दी, தமிழ், తెలుగు, Urdu, ಕನ್ನಡ, Southeast Asian Indonesian, Vietnamese, Thai, မြန်မာဘာသာ, বাংলা
European español, Deutsch, français, Greek, português do Brasil, polski, română, русский, Nederlands, norsk, svenska, suomi, Italian
Middle Eastern & African عربى, Turkish, Persian, Hebrew, Afrikaans, isiZulu, Kiswahili,
Other Bulgarian, Hungarian, Czech, Swedish, മലയാളം, मराठी, ਪੰਜਾਬੀ, ગુજરાતી, Portuguese, Ukrainian