Tearoom Trade

Tearoom Trade is a term used to describe a specific type of impersonal sex between men in public restrooms, also known as "tearooms." The term was popularized by the sociologist Laud Humphreys in his groundbreaking study, Tearoom Trade: Impersonal Sex in Public Places, published in 1970. Humphreys' research provided significant insights into the behaviors and social dynamics of men who engage in this type of activity.

Study and Methodology[edit | edit source]

Laud Humphreys conducted his research by acting as a "watchqueen," a lookout who warns participants of potential intrusions. He observed and recorded the interactions without the participants' knowledge. Later, he tracked down some of the men he observed by noting their license plate numbers and obtaining their addresses through the Department of Motor Vehicles. He then conducted follow-up interviews under the guise of a social health survey, ensuring the anonymity of his subjects.

Findings[edit | edit source]

Humphreys' study revealed that many of the men who engaged in tearoom trade were not openly homosexual and often led conventional heterosexual lives. His findings challenged prevailing stereotypes and provided a more nuanced understanding of sexual orientation and sexual behavior. He found that the majority of participants were married men with children, and many were respected members of their communities.

Ethical Controversy[edit | edit source]

The study sparked significant ethical controversy due to Humphreys' methods, particularly his use of deception and the invasion of privacy. Critics argued that his approach violated the principles of informed consent and confidentiality. Despite these criticisms, the study is still considered a landmark in sociological research and has influenced subsequent studies on sexual behavior and ethics in research.

Impact and Legacy[edit | edit source]

The Tearoom Trade study has had a lasting impact on the fields of sociology, psychology, and sexuality studies. It has prompted discussions about the ethics of research methods and the importance of protecting participants' privacy. The study also contributed to a broader understanding of the diversity of human sexual behavior and the social contexts in which it occurs.